Awards & Accolades
Choosing Your Mass Tort Attorney
Countless Americans claim that Monsanto has lied about the popular herbicide Roundup’s safety. Exposure to their product might cause non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a lethal type of cancer. The company allegedly failed to warn the public about the toxic effects and downplayed the risk and of glyphosate, forcing many to file a lawsuit to seek compensation. If you are an agricultural laborer, farmer, landscaper, or any type of professional who may have been exposed to Roundup, we’re here to help you file a claim.
Landmark Verdicts & Settlements
Why You Should Call Jordan Law Today
The attorneys at Jordan Law are members of some of the most prestigious lawyer organizations in the country and boast a terrific reputation among the best consumer rights advocates in the United States.
Our winning team of lawyers is here to protect you from negligent companies. Contact us today to receive a free and fully confidential consultation.
The company allegedly downplayed the risk and failed to warn the public about the toxic effects of their product. If you are a gardener, farmer, agricultural laborer or any other type of professional who may have been exposed to glyphosate, you may be eligible to receive a monetary compensation.
Frequently Asked Roundup Lawsuit Questions
What Is Roundup?
Roundup is the most widely-used weed and grass killer across the world – so much that Monsanto earns close to $5 billion in revenue each year. Its main ingredient, glyphosate, acts by disrupting the activity of some essential plant enzymes. Combined with the superior resistance of the genetically modified (GMO) plants produced by them, Monsanto, sells countless superior crops with high yields worldwide.
Why Is Roundup Dangerous?
During the last decade, many studies showed that exposure to glyphosate is responsible for causing cancer, including a lethal form of leukemia (blood cancer) called non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The weed killer may also cause other forms of lymphoma as well.
Professional workers who are constantly exposed to this chemical, such as farmers, park employees, and gardeners have been never warned about this risk, and never knew they had to wear protection to avoid breathing it.
Residues of glyphosate can contaminate water and food, and reach dangerous levels in the human body. In 2016, The Alliance for Natural Health USA found high concentrations of this substance in breakfast cereals, eggs, and other common food products.
Have Many Roundup Litigations Been Filed in Court?
Many U.S. attorneys started filing Roundup litigations on behalf of plaintiffs who want to hold Monsanto responsible for the dangerous side effects of the controversial weed killer. Lawyers argue that countless people may have been diagnosed with cancer after being exposed to glyphosate.
After plaintiff Edward Hardeman (Case No. 3:16-cv-00525) filed the first Roundup lawsuit in February 1, 2016, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, many victims of Monsanto’s lethal product followed and decided to sue for damage. Eventually, in October 2016, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) consolidated all these cases in the in the Northern District of California /MDL No. 2741 — In RE: Roundup Products Liability MDL) forming a new Mass Tort Litigation.
Was There a Roundup and Monsanto Cover-Up?
In May 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pulled offline a report where glyphosate was reported to be “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” Together with another 13 documents, the 86-pages report disappeared after just a few hours since it was published, and the agency later claimed it withdrew it since it was still unfinished, although the word “FINAL” was clearly printed on every single page.
On March 14, 2017, according to documents included in a case filed in a federal court in San Francisco, the whole research was allegedly ghostwritten by Monsanto itself. The company tried to conceal Roundup’s dangerousness in what really looked like a giant conspiracy. Some senior officers in the EPA, however, disagreed with the allegedly false safety assessment and quickly removed the document from the website. On the other hand, in one of its previous reports, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified the herbicide as “probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A),” stemming a large controversy.